Užívání služebních dopravních prostředků v Policii České republiky je upraveno,nařízením Ministerstva vnitra č. 33/2011, kterým se upravují zásady výkonu příslušnosti hospodaření a nakládání s automobilním majetkem a jeho užívání.
Nicméně chtěl bych dát tímto článkem ministerstvu podnět a věřím, že se toho někdo brzy chytí, protože to je poměrně podstatné i pro další fungování Policie. Mnou navrhované usnesení se bude jmenovat Vigilum currus agit feliciter. Toto pojmenování zdůvodním, zejména si řekneme čím se ono usnesení bude zabývat.
Přesné znění onoho návrhu usnesení tedy zní takto: Policie ČR musí dbát bezpečnosti provozu. Všichni příslušníci Policie České republiky, kteří jsou řidiči služebních motorových vozidel, jsou povinni v rámci získávání a zdokonalování odborné způsobilosti k řízení těchto vozidel podrobit se výcviku, periodickému školení a případně speciálnímu tréninku ke zvýšení praktické dovednosti při mezních a krizových situacích provozu vozidel. Školení je součástí služební přípravy a je podmínkou pro získání a držení povolení k řízení služebních motorových vozidel ve vymezeném rozsahu (dále jen „povolení“). Provádí se v resortních autoškolách v rozsahu 16 hodin pro žadatele o povolení a 8 hodin každoročně pro držitele povolení. Součástí školení pro žadatele o povolení je prověrka řidičských schopností a dovedností v praktické jízdě. Policie České republiky se tímto vzdává veškerých práv školit nadále jakýmkoli způsobem ostatní řidiče o bezpečnosti provozu.
Jediným člověkem, který má nadále povoleno jezdit i na červenou bez zapnutých výstražných znamení je pan nadstrážmistr Tomáš Veselý z OOP Brno - Sever.
úterý 23. srpna 2022
středa 17. srpna 2022
Omlouvám se, že jsem přežil pane řidiči. Vaše doklady, prosím?
Sorry, jako pane nadstrážmistře Tomáši Veselý, takhle fakt ne. Jsou věci, které prostě nejsou možné. Někdy slova nestačí.
Omlouvám se, asi jsem Vás špatně odhadl. Možná máte dokonce pravdu. To služební vozidlo jste třeba neřídil jako prase a nelhal jste o tom, že jste údajně na přechodu pro chodce, které ono vozidlo mělo projet na červenou bez zapnuté houkačky dával na vše svědomitě pozor. Možná Vás dokonce mají podřízení na OOP Brno-Sever rádi. Třeba u policie i po uveřejnění článku na tomto blogu a posléze i v dalších médiích vydržíte ještě dlouhá léta. Nevím a není v mé kompetenci říci, zda někdo umí řídit. A vlastně ani nechci, je to poněkud nad mé síly. Rád tedy tuto starost ponechám jiným.
Pro pomalejší: Jdete přes přechod na zelenou. Přes onen přechod rychle za Vámi přejede bez varování auto na červenou a vyděsí Vás k smrti.
Třeba jste do záznamu pane nadstrážmistře Tomáši fakt nelhal. Kdo ví. Postavil se za Vás dokonce krajský ředitel. Ruka ruku myje.
A jen dodávám a přebírám tezi - Policista za volantem z Brna a JMK je potenciální společensky nebezpečný vrah a může beztrestně ohrozit bezpečnost chodců, dokonce je třeba i zabít.
Pro pomalejší: Jdete přes přechod na zelenou. Přes onen přechod rychle za Vámi přejede bez varování auto na červenou a vyděsí Vás k smrti.
Třeba jste do záznamu pane nadstrážmistře Tomáši fakt nelhal. Kdo ví. Postavil se za Vás dokonce krajský ředitel. Ruka ruku myje.
A jen dodávám a přebírám tezi - Policista za volantem z Brna a JMK je potenciální společensky nebezpečný vrah a může beztrestně ohrozit bezpečnost chodců, dokonce je třeba i zabít.
neděle 22. července 2018
Proč rozhodují média o vládě?
Rád bych se zde velmi důrazně a hlasitě zastal ministrů
Taťány Malé a Petra Krčála, kteří byli pod tlakem médií zcela
nesmyslně donuceni odejít.
Je očividné, že šlo v obou případech o zástupný problém.
Někomu vadili a novináři je na objednávku museli odstranit. V případě pana
ministra Petra Krčála je věc o to závažnější, že šlo o prvního ministra od vlády
TOP09, který byl připraven napravit zločiny v sociálním systému a jde o člověka
z oboru, který celý život v sociální sféře působí.
Pokud by
novináři chtěli být upřímní, měli by začít u sebe, tedy u šéfredaktorů všech
registrovaných redakcí (nejen aktuálně nepohodlné konkurence). Poté
mohou následovat ministři, úředníci a další. Ne však jednotlivci, ale všichni
bez rozdílu. Pokrytecké snažení se o senzaci tohoto typu nebylo a není vhodnou záminkou pro mediální aféry a osobní útoky novinářů, od kterých jsme viděli již všechno možné.
Dnes bohužel stále nedokážeme připustit, že diplomové práce jsou
v podstatě jen povinná formalita, píší se neustále nová a nová témata a
nikdo od nich neočekává převratné objevy. Občas se opravdu kvalitní diplomová
práce objeví a tady jsem velmi pro to, aby všechny diplomové práce
byly ze zákona dohledatelné pro účely studia široké veřejnosti.
Tomáš Babický 22. 7. 2018
středa 23. května 2018
středa 11. dubna 2018
Open letter to Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook
Mr. Zuckerberg, since yesterday I am supporter of senator Booker from Congress of United States of America. He was
talking about support for groups. I want also give credits to senators mr. Bill Nelson, mr. Gary Peters and mrs. Feinstein for good speeches.
Why are you having open groups without ANY possible admin-help from Facebook? Why have you NOT any functional help for users? Your idea of community users for users is nice, but anything happen on Facebook (crime, violation, cyberbully...) - law is clueless, 'cause it is just "company" and they can only tell victims "do not use it". You have NO support, NO admins for groups. You only delete "bad content", but what is "bad content" on Facebook? I reported much "bad things" and they were "not violating community standards".
There still are questions. I really don't understand it. Why you lied to United States Congress? You are collecting data and store them forever, until user delete account. There is big difference between closing and deleting. If you close account, data still belongs to Facebook. If you delete your account, data are deleted too. Why did you told that your users shouldn't be surprised what you do with their data?
Mr. Zuckerberg, I am not happy how you lead Facebook and I am asking you for make changes and hire admins. Thank You and wish succes with it.
Tomas, First FBook's Journal
Congresswoman Castor says you collect medical data on the internet? Zuckerberg says yes. Is that a mistake?
Mark Zuckerberg: “I think the GDPR in general is going to be a very positive step for the internet.”
Republican Rep. Joe Barton of Texas said: “Why is Facebook censoring conservative bloggers such as Diamond and Silk? Facebook called them ‘unsafe’ to the community. That is ludicrous. They hold conservative views. That isn’t unsafe.” “Congressman,” Zuckerberg responded, “in that specific case, our team made an enforcement error and we have already gotten in touch with them to reverse it.”
Representative Frank Pallone Jr., a New Jersey Democrat, pressed Mr. Zuckerberg on whether Facebook would agree or refuse to change Facebook’s default settings to minimize collection and use of users’ data. “This is a complex issue that deserves more than a one word answer,” Mr. Zuckerberg answered. “That’s disappointing to me,” Mr. Pallone responded.
"You are hurting people. Do you agree with that statement?" Rep. McKinley
"No amount of people that we can hire will be enough to review all of the content. We need to build sophisticated AI tools to flag certain content." Mark Zuckerberg said
Senator Kamala Harris “During the course of this hearing these last four hours you’ve been asked several critical questions for which you don’t have answers,”
Senator Kamala Harris “However, a decision was made not to notify the users. So my question is did anyone at Facebook have a conversation, at the time that you became aware of this breach, have a conversation wherein the decision was made not to contact the users? Because I wasn’t in a lot of them… I mean, I’m not sure what other people discussed. Were you part of a discussion that resulted in the decision not to inform your users?”
Mark Zuckerberg “I don’t remember a conversation like that, for the reason why—”
Senator Kamala Harris “Are you aware of anyone in leadership at Facebook who was in a conversation where a decision was made not to inform your users,” she asked, “or do you believe no such conversation ever took place?”
Mark Zuckerberg “I’m not sure whether there was a conversation about that,” he said, “But I can tell you about the thought process at the time, of the company, which was that in 2015 when we hard about this, we banned the developer and we demanded that they delete all the data and stop using it, and the same with Cambridge Analytica. They told us they had—”
Senator Kamala Harris “I’ve heard your testimony in that regard. But I’m talking about notification of the users. This relates to the issue of transparency and the relationship of trust — informing the user about what you know in terms of how their personal information has been misused. When you personally became aware of this, did you or senior leadership do an inquiry to find out who at Facebook had this information, and did they not have a discussion about whether or not the users should be informed, back in December of 2015?”
Mark Zuckerberg “Senator, in retrospect I think we clearly view it as a mistake that we didn’t inform people, and we did that based on false information that we thought that the case was closed and that the data had been deleted.”
Beth Gautier, a Facebook spokeswoman, said: “When you delete something, we remove it so it’s not visible or accessible on Facebook. You can also delete your account whenever you want. It may take up to 90 days to delete all backups of data on our servers.”
Why are you having open groups without ANY possible admin-help from Facebook? Why have you NOT any functional help for users? Your idea of community users for users is nice, but anything happen on Facebook (crime, violation, cyberbully...) - law is clueless, 'cause it is just "company" and they can only tell victims "do not use it". You have NO support, NO admins for groups. You only delete "bad content", but what is "bad content" on Facebook? I reported much "bad things" and they were "not violating community standards".
There still are questions. I really don't understand it. Why you lied to United States Congress? You are collecting data and store them forever, until user delete account. There is big difference between closing and deleting. If you close account, data still belongs to Facebook. If you delete your account, data are deleted too. Why did you told that your users shouldn't be surprised what you do with their data?
Mr. Zuckerberg, I am not happy how you lead Facebook and I am asking you for make changes and hire admins. Thank You and wish succes with it.
Tomas, First FBook's Journal
Mark Zuckerberg Prepared Statement by jakeosmith on Scribd
LIVE UPDATE (second day):Congresswoman Castor says you collect medical data on the internet? Zuckerberg says yes. Is that a mistake?
Mark Zuckerberg: “I think the GDPR in general is going to be a very positive step for the internet.”
Republican Rep. Joe Barton of Texas said: “Why is Facebook censoring conservative bloggers such as Diamond and Silk? Facebook called them ‘unsafe’ to the community. That is ludicrous. They hold conservative views. That isn’t unsafe.” “Congressman,” Zuckerberg responded, “in that specific case, our team made an enforcement error and we have already gotten in touch with them to reverse it.”
Representative Frank Pallone Jr., a New Jersey Democrat, pressed Mr. Zuckerberg on whether Facebook would agree or refuse to change Facebook’s default settings to minimize collection and use of users’ data. “This is a complex issue that deserves more than a one word answer,” Mr. Zuckerberg answered. “That’s disappointing to me,” Mr. Pallone responded.
"You are hurting people. Do you agree with that statement?" Rep. McKinley
"No amount of people that we can hire will be enough to review all of the content. We need to build sophisticated AI tools to flag certain content." Mark Zuckerberg said
Senator Kamala Harris “During the course of this hearing these last four hours you’ve been asked several critical questions for which you don’t have answers,”
- Whether Facebook tracks users after they log out (his answer to this, “I know that people use cookies on the internet, and that people can probably correlate activity between sessions,” was a monumental eye-roller considering we know this is a crucial capability Facebook deploys.)
- Whether Facebook can track activity across devices
- Who is Facebook’s biggest competitor (Senator Graham pursued this with vigor)
- Whether Facebook “may store up to 96 categories of user information” (I would be surprised if it is that few)
- Whether he knew about Aleksandr Kogan’s terms of service or whether Kogan could sell or transfer data under them
Senator Kamala Harris “However, a decision was made not to notify the users. So my question is did anyone at Facebook have a conversation, at the time that you became aware of this breach, have a conversation wherein the decision was made not to contact the users? Because I wasn’t in a lot of them… I mean, I’m not sure what other people discussed. Were you part of a discussion that resulted in the decision not to inform your users?”
Mark Zuckerberg “I don’t remember a conversation like that, for the reason why—”
Senator Kamala Harris “Are you aware of anyone in leadership at Facebook who was in a conversation where a decision was made not to inform your users,” she asked, “or do you believe no such conversation ever took place?”
Mark Zuckerberg “I’m not sure whether there was a conversation about that,” he said, “But I can tell you about the thought process at the time, of the company, which was that in 2015 when we hard about this, we banned the developer and we demanded that they delete all the data and stop using it, and the same with Cambridge Analytica. They told us they had—”
Senator Kamala Harris “I’ve heard your testimony in that regard. But I’m talking about notification of the users. This relates to the issue of transparency and the relationship of trust — informing the user about what you know in terms of how their personal information has been misused. When you personally became aware of this, did you or senior leadership do an inquiry to find out who at Facebook had this information, and did they not have a discussion about whether or not the users should be informed, back in December of 2015?”
Mark Zuckerberg “Senator, in retrospect I think we clearly view it as a mistake that we didn’t inform people, and we did that based on false information that we thought that the case was closed and that the data had been deleted.”
Beth Gautier, a Facebook spokeswoman, said: “When you delete something, we remove it so it’s not visible or accessible on Facebook. You can also delete your account whenever you want. It may take up to 90 days to delete all backups of data on our servers.”
čtvrtek 22. března 2018
stand-up :: Jak se stát politikem // How to become politician
Pro Vás, kdo chcete zvítězit ve volbách a potřebujete znát stoprocentně fungující a osvědčené postupy a metody, doporučuji shlédnout toto video...
For You, who wants to win in elections... I recommend to watch this video (play subtitles).
For You, who wants to win in elections... I recommend to watch this video (play subtitles).
středa 1. listopadu 2017
Slyšení Facebooku a Twitteru před ruským Senátem (2017)
Facebook a Twitter před ruským Senátem 31. 10. 2017
Přihlásit se k odběru:
Příspěvky (Atom)